Current Situation Analysis Oct 24, 2025

What Trump is doing and not doing according to the laws of ideological dynamics

Current situation analysis update 10/24/2025

By Daniel Ben Abraham

When President Trump was asked on his recent flight to Israel, “What happens three years from now when you are no longer President”, he responded “I don’t know.”

Even with the U.S.’s and Israel’s brilliant diplomacy, legal advocacy, economic incentive, and most moral use of force; Hamas refuses to disarm, Hezbollah is rearming, and Iran won’t change its nuclear ambitions. Islamism is uniting with Leftism and anti-Semitism globally, continuing the interrelated ideological war against Israel, America, and the West. The United Nations has lost its moral compass, and over 150 nations increasingly support a terrorist-led Islamist cause to conquer Israel, and then themselves next.

What President Trump have done is incredible, fantastic, and worthy of a Nobel, but unfortunately, the Islamist ideology we face is clever enough to lay low and wait out his Presidency. Unless we learn to neutralize enemy ideologies on the ideological level now, their wars will reignite and continue thereafter against Israel, the U.S., the West, and the world, in a “forever war” not like World War II, but like the 1400-year Sunni-Shiite conflict.

To fix this, here is a little introduction and background understanding into my coming ideas solutions already in the works for neutralizing Islamist and terrorist ideologies on the ideological level.

In summary, military action, legal action, and diplomacy with logic and persuasion and even Abraham Accords alone won’t work, but understanding of “ideological dynamics” will.

Understanding ideological wars

The Middle East is not a place of rational individuals acting in their own best interest, but irrational-appearing ideologies like TDS and Leftism, including anti-Semitism, anti-Zionism, the Sunni-Shiite divide, and tribalism. Most individuals and leaders don’t act in their own best interests, but according to their ideology’s. If we understand how to control such ideologies, we’ll have all the leverage in the world, to make peace, and help all people, including Arabs and Muslims.

As Carl Jung said, “people don’t have ideas, ideas possess people”. Hamas is not a person nor a group. Like broader anti-Zionism, Islamism, and anti-Semitism, these are overlapping, collective, unconscious, neuro-chemical, narrative-driven, viral, hive-mind, “ideological entities”. It takes over rational human will like a mob riot possesses individuals to destroy their own neighborhoods with glee. That’s what we saw from the perpetrators of 10/7 - exuberance. The “Palestine” protests around the world are not speech, but an unconscious, contagious, connection to the ideological hive mind - the opposite of speech. Terrorism is not the true problem and cannot be stopped by itself. Terrorism, rather, is just a symptom, a subgroup, along with the behavior of the ideological supergroup of Islamists, and expansionist-minded migrants, politicians, world leaders, diplomats, and judges, and all the wars involving Israel and the U.S., from 9/11 to 10/7, of the uncontrolled power dynamics of Islamist expansion.

First, the Arabs armies attacked Israel in ’48, ’67, and ’73, and when they couldn’t defeat Israel, it became the PLFP, Islamic Jihad, the PLO, Hezbollah, and now Hamas. It would be yet another group after Hamas because we are playing whack-a-mole instead of addressing the underlying problem on the ideological level. Such ideologies can forever recruit new members from the fertile population base, even if every Hamas member were killed. That’s why in the Bible with Amalek, God told the Jews to destroy “all memory” of them. However, we cannot nor do we want do that with all Palestinians or Arabs.

What causes ideological wars

Ideological wars are caused by polarization from divides over moral questions that humanity cannot properly answer. Unanswered questions, like whether the Palestinian should be rewarded even though their ideology seeks to destroy Israel, whether Gazans can choose to leave, and whether Islamists may conquer the world, allow evil ideologies to rise. Our current systems like the United Nations and the International Court of Justice have lost their moral compass and are now unable to answer these outstanding questions correctly. While the world despised terrorism a few decades ago as with Munich, now, the world sides with their supportive population. This is because every ideological group carries with it its own relative moral perspective that ultimately supersedes logic and individual interest. As the ideology becomes more powerful, its relative moral perspective presents to adherents as more correct. It makes adherents see justice and even facts differently, which is why Trump and so many other Western conservative leaders, Netanyahu, Marine Le Penn, Sarkozy, were targeted for prosecution by the Left.

While terrorists are not afraid to die, they are very afraid of harm to their ideological entity. They flinch when we hit a nerve, and that’s where every breakthrough has come. Such ideological entities have weaknesses, and can be neutralized through understandings of their vulnerabilities, as described below. Our enemy thinks in terms of ideological entities, the “Zionist entity”, “there has never been a ‘Palestinian entity’”, and are playing on a completely different chess board we do not understand, over the course of centuries.

A Palestinian individual can make peace, but the “Palestinian ideology” cannot. If one individual makes peace, he is removed and the ideology channels power to someone more aggressive. Likewise, Hamas is unable to disarm because it’s an ideology. A person can disarm, but a hostile ideology cannot. If one Hamas leader threw down his weapons, another one would pick up those weapons and then be the new leader. It’s a living organism and Trump is asking it to commit suicide – something it is unable to do. These ideologies channel power to whoever is most aggressive; similar to how the most extremist ideological Democrats like AOC become the leaders of the Democratic Party.

In short, if we answer these outstanding moral questions correctly, enemy ideologies dissolve; if we don’t, or answer them incorrectly, they become more powerful, and take us toward increasing and endless war.

Why the current plan for Middle East peace will not succeed without more

President Trump’s Abraham Accords and 20-Point Peace plan are groundbreaking. The current broader plan for Middle East peace involves pursuing peace deals with the Arabs, to hopefully pacify Arab populations. Trump miraculously got Arab leaders to agree to things they never have before. The problem is, over 90% of Arab populations still don’t want Israel to exist. The broadest ideological group of 480 million Arabs see peace deals as “Hodaybiya” (pretend and temporary), and their ideology will fuel hostility forever. The Palestinians are merely the primary attacking arm, the left jab so to speak, of this broader ideology.

Arab leaders dangle revocable paper “peace” according to modern diplomatic terms and use them as weapons, while continuing the ideological anti-Zionist war for their populations’ majorities. The world is becoming increasingly ideological, polarized, and anti-Semitic, until one day Israel will be isolated, and then attacked on all fronts. Israel’s enemies thought Biden was their opportunity, which is why October 7th happened. Even Egypt, Jordan, and Turkey were ready to join the multi-front attack, as will Iran and others in an endless campaign the next moment the U.S. isn’t fully behind Israel, after his Presidency.

It’s not a war - It’s a riddle.

Ideological entities don’t behave according to their narratives, nor their stated goals, nor the goals of their adherents.

…When Israel was attacked, anti-semitism rose before Israel even responded…

…Global Anti-Americanism rose after 9/11…

…Islamism joins with Leftism, Communism, and other ideologies when their narratives are contradictory because their ideological entities gain power from doing so…

…Millions of people are willing to suffer generation after generation against their own interests to spread the ideology that causes their suffering…

…Muslims escape the Arab world to Europe and then vote for Sharia…

…Californians similarly escape its Leftist policies and then vote for similar Leftist candidates elsewhere because they don’t understand their own ideology…

…The pro-Palestine riots continue even though there’s a cease-fire…

…When Hamas kills Palestinians, nobody seems to care…

So while Trump’s strategy may work for any rational people, the Middle East is not a rational place. We only get to win if we solve this riddle, and it is the answer, buried within the mysteries of the irrationality of anti-Semitism, to not only Hamas, but the entire endless conflict.

My theories on ideological dynamics answer the riddle, and explain the behavior and weaknesses of such ideological entities, which behave as parasitic, sovereign, (living) supra-human organisms with separate and superior interests to their adherents. After all, if an ideological entity sends terrorists to die to protect it, which is the sovereign being and which is the drone?

As a negotiator, Trump should understand that with all America’s and Israel’s excellent and necessary diplomacy, legal action, economic incentives, and proper use of force against terrorists wherever they may be, as negotiators his strategy is still not fully dealing with the true party-players at the table - the ideological entities themselves, of which Arab leaders and terrorist and journalists and judges are simply pawns. Meaning, the ideological forces are primary and causal and the behavior of parties is secondary and a symptom. Logic can’t win the world’s moral viewpoint because anti-Semitic ideologies do not spread by reason. Otherwise, Jews having excellent debaters would not have been expelled from every diaspora. Anti-Semitism is “irrational” in that it doesn’t improve the life of the anti-Semite nor spread by logic, but irrational doesn’t mean random. Nor it is randomly cyclical. In individuals, anti-Semitic perspective is a personal deficiency, but collectively it functions like a contagious amygdala parasite affecting moral perspective. It’s a bias based on the power gains of the supergroup entity. There is not only a pattern, but a set of rules, and solutions. It will consume the world like every diaspora, unless ideological dynamics are employed.

Why a “Palestinian state” generally cannot work here

The “Palestinian cause” is actually two ideologies, 1) for prosperity, and 2) for conquest of Israel; and the problem is they are intertwined. The world can’t feed one without feeding the other. Every step closer to a Palestinian “state” also empowers the ideology seeking conquest of Jerusalem. Palestinians are not either/or. Rather, this divide runs down the center of the heart of nearly every Palestinian, who may want peace, but will also increasingly want to conquer Israel if on the verge of doing so. We have to solve the ideological problem first, or provide territory elsewhere.

When we give power to an ideological movement, subgroups rise wanting more; which is why gay rights and feminist movements in the U.S. upon obtaining equality produced more aggressive and more extreme subgroups like third-wave feminism and LGBTQ Leftism.

The Palestinian cause is not a response to their suffering: and every attack against Israel (‘48, ‘67, ‘73, 10/7 etc.) has been because the enemy felt they were powerful enough to try to destroy Israel, whether by direct military or broader ideological support.

President Trump is hoping that Palestinian prosperity and an international stabilization force will quell the ideology. However, individuals can be appeased and satisfied, but ideologies cannot. An individual can agree to be peaceful, but an ideology cannot, because the ideological entity will just transfer power to other more extreme voices. Bringing an Islamist ideology closer to its goal like Jerusalem only makes it hungrier. If there were a Palestinian “State”, many Palestinians may be prosperous and satisfied, but the hostility of the entire Arab world will still flow to those who stir up increasing hatred against Israel. With a Palestinian “state”, they can build up an army, in East Jerusalem, bring in unlimited soldiers and weapons, without Israel being able to stop the buildup, then attack Israel, at which point a seven-front war will open, with everyone blaming Israel. It’s a fundamental principle that prosperity will not quell the conquest ideology, because the conquest ideology is not based on oppression, it’s just an excuse narrative.

If we allow in Turkish, Qatari and or Egyptian troops with the same “conquer Israel” ideology, Hamas will infiltrate and work around them as they are part of the same ideological supergroup. Erdogan has threatened destruction of Israel, and they will be there to support Palestinians against Israel no matter what they agree to. It’s only a matter of time before Israeli action or inaction sparks a conflict with Turkish, Qatari, or Egyptian troops, who will then bring in reinforcements, soon turning into all out war with Turkey. These ideological forces are amygdala-based and control over human will, even if they genuinely intend to agree in good faith. They will act rational and reasonable, but as soon as the tension kicks up, they will revert to their ideology.

Of course, we know what would happen if We were to ask Saudi Arabia about dividing Mecca to be half controlled by Sunnis and half controlled by Shiites, or the same with Istanbul the capital of a Shiite state in Turkey. Or if East London, East Paris, East Moscow, or East Beijing were the proposed new capitals of Islamic states created in those countries. It’s absurd. It would be like waving a red flag in front of a bull, as it would be for the “conquest of Israel” ideological entity, which is far broader supergroup of Hamas.

In short, a “Palestinian state” will encourage conflict because while conflict may harm individual Palestinians, the ideology is spread and strengthened from conflict; and the ideological dynamics control over the individual interests.

Why a Palestinian state might have worked 20 years ago, but not today

The world’s moral compass has shifted so far towards the Leftist-Islamist ideological moral perspective because of these spreading, deepening ideological entities, that it’s completely broken. Since the world now rewards the Palestinian ideology after October 7th, the world would also reward it after there’s a Palestinian “state” when they will attack Israel again. The world’s sympathy for Palestinians now overrides intolerance of their genocidal aims towards Israel, which is a green light to continue attacking. That’s why there cannot be a Palestinian state now when there could be before. A state is permanent, but a promise to behave is temporary. Without first correcting the world’s moral compass and solving the underlying global ideologically-induced misunderstandings, a Palestinian state would mean unlimited enhanced attempts to destroy Israel because the world would side with them even if they start it.

Without a multiparty democracy, of which there are none in the Arab world, where would 480 million people divert their inherent oppositional tendency if not at Israel?

The solutions in the Bible

The kryptonite that will dissolve any Islamist ideological entity is it cannot withstand diversity of ideological viewpoint. That’s why there are no Arab democracies. It’s also why it’s unlikely a “Palestine” would be the first. They have no ability to decide who should be in power. That’s why the Sunni-Shiite divide rages for 1400 years. Think about it: Mohammed‘s cousin died 1300 years ago, and yet the dispute still rages! And, if there is any doubt, ideological entities are compelled to fight for control! Even Hamas and Hezbollah cannot operate in the same sphere without killing each other first before they can decide to kill Jews. Because it’s all about the ideological power dynamics of doing so. For example, terrorism is a symptom of broad Islamist expansion, which causes ideological subsets to compete for power gains in new prospective territories not under an established Islamic authority’s control. This is why Muslims divide the world into “Dar al Islam” (house/territory under Islamic rule), and Dar al Harb” (house at war). It’s a very different concept of “peace.” That Muslims cannot dominate over Jews in Israel riles them to no end. If Israel were smaller or limited by a Palestinian state, that would make them even hungrier to conquer it. They would simply change their excuse and demands, and the ideology would continue on the same conquest path.

The Bible, Genesis 16:12, says regarding the Ishmaelites, who are modern Arabs, “He will be a wild donkey of a man; his hand will be against everyone and everyone’s hand against him, and he will live in hostility toward all his brothers.” That’s their weakness. As I explain in my other writings, “The opposite of war is nuance.” And, “You don’t need an army to stop another army, just ask them a question they can’t answer.”

PM Netanyahu called the planned operation in Gaza “Gideon’s Chariots”, but remember how the Midionites were defeated by Gideon in Judges 7:22: “And the three hundred blew the trumpets, and the Lord set every man’s sword against his fellow, even throughout all the host.” They were turned against each other. The “host”, because the ideology behaves like a supra-human parasite.

This is why the Bible says to “scatter your enemies”. in Numbers 10:35: “And it came to pass, when the ark set forward, that Moses said: Rise up Lord and let your enemies be scattered and let them that hate you flee before you.” It doesn’t say kill your enemies here, but “scatter”, meaning divide; separate, meaning ideologically. It says to “let them flee”, but the Arab world has been preventing them from fleeing with Egypt closing its borders.

The weaknesses of Islamist ideological entities

It’s not that we never find a solution to the ideological problems, but that whenever we do, they make us a deal we can’t refuse to not use it.

Not logic nor persuasion, here is how we neutralize intangible ideological entities:

1. Ideological division - This works whether the entity is divided into two, divided from other local ideologies, groups, or clans; or separated from a supergroup ideology like its own population base or the Arab world. Your 20-point plan correctly divided Hamas from the Arab leadership, and Hamas top-level from lowers who could receive amnesty. Hamas is an ideological subgroup of the entire Arab anti-Zionist ideology of most of 480 million Arabs, and couldn’t operate opposed to them while fighting Israel and local clans at the same time. It was brilliant diplomacy.

2. Communication that destroys the ideology’s narrative weakens it - This is why Charlie was killed, by the ideology acting through an individual. The best such communication and systems utilize strategic ideological division along entities’ narrative fulcrums, turning ideological subgroups against each other, just like Gideon.

3. Reduction in the supportive population base - This is why the Arabs oppose Palestinians being able to emigrate from Gaza. Trump’s initial plan announced in February calling for Gazan emigration was absolutely correct, as is his 20-Point Plan’s allowance of Gazans to voluntarily leave. Egyptian Islamic scholars issued a Fatwa against emigration the next day.

Maimonides taught the lesson of the “three walls” in war, that ancient Israel whenever at war must always give its enemy an escape route. This divides ideologically those wanting to fight from those wanting to flee. Over 3000 years ago, before Israel’s King Saul followed God’s Commandment to attack the Amaleks, he first told the Kenites to separate from the Amaleks he was about to destroy. This let the Kenites choose whether they stood with the Amaleks and wanted to be destroyed, or wanted to save themselves.

The reason Trump’s February 2025 plan of Gazan emigration is absolutely correct (as I have been advocating for two years) is not because it moves the Palestinians, but because Palestinian choice to leave divides the ideology, and separates the ideology of prosperity from the ideology of conquest of Israel, and turns them oppositional to each other. Allowing Palestinians who want to leave to do so creates accountability for whomever (terrorist group or otherwise) may control Gaza/Judea/Samaria. The more conflict in Gaza, the more Palestinians leave. This creates a self-regulating system where the more ideological they are, the more the ideology’s supportive population base is reduced.**

The Arab leaders are preventing the Palestinians from having that choice intentionally, because it would weaken their own broader Arab anti-Zionist ideological entity as well, if they say Palestinians don’t want to leave, but actual Palestinians do leave. Remember there is no democracy in Gaza, so voting with their feet is likely the only thing that can divide the intertwined “Palestinian cause” ideology into two separate opposing entities. The world‘s adoption of the false morality against “Palestinians’ choice” to leave Gaza is a cornerstone of the global ideology continuing this war, as an unanswered moral question and moral paradox. The world takes in refugees from every other conflict zone, and has no right to put its ideological will ahead of each Palestinian’s own individual choice. It divides supporting Palestinians from supporting the Palestinian “cause”. This is a debate that only the good guys can win, yet absent on the world stage are any heartfelt viral videos showing Palestinians wanting to leave Gaza.

Thus, a “Palestinian state” cannot work in Gaza, Judea, Samaria, and East Jerusalem. It might work in the Sinai, Jordan, Lebanon, or Saudi Arabia, because these would divide the conquest ideology from the living-in-peace ideology.

4. Loss of land - for a conquest ideology - divides the expansionists from protectionists. It’s not about loss of the land itself. If Israel could take land defensively like every other attacked nation in the history of the world under the international law of conquest, it would ideologically divide those wanting to attack from those not wanting to lose land. This why the Arabs and U.N. have worked tirelessly to prevent Israel from defensively taking land, ex: U.N. S.C. Res. 1701, 2334, the Golan, precisely to prevent weakening of hostile ideological entities. The world answered this legal and moral question incorrectly and adopted a false moral paradox, worsening the conflict. The credible threat of annexation is a strong deterrent to future attacks as it divides future would-be attacking ideologies. If Israel does not annex land during this conflict, it will signal it is unwilling or unable to do so, laying the ground work for future attacks. Simply, the attacking ideology has nothing to lose.

5. And of course, reduction in resources, and moral support. Hopefully the cutoff of money, resources, and support to Hamas from neighbors remains long term.

6. Sometimes terrorist groups can be neutralized by bringing them into the political process like in Northern Ireland. However, there the ideological population base and the terrorist group overlapped the same geographic area, whereas the “Palestinian cause” is spread across the entire Arab world. Bringing Hamas into the future Gaza political process as long as they cease terrorism has not been publicly addressed. However, it would likely cause a temporary splinter with any accepted political branch losing or having only intermittent and transactional control of the military wing.

Conclusion

The Arab leaders agreed to Trump’s 20-Point Plan because they believe it is the path to a Palestinian “state” that continues the “struggle”. And, because they feared, if they didn’t, PM Netanyahu may annex Gaza, relocate Palestinians, bomb Qatar again if not other Arab countries (which makes them very vulnerable from within), and support opposition in Gaza. Even though the diplomacy by Kushner and Witkoff was outstanding, per my understanding, these are the true underlying reasons they were able to get the deal through. Hopefully this helps better explain some of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s thinking.

Now, Hamas is working to reclaim power, eliminate opposition, and for Palestinians and the rest of the Arab leaders to realign with them ideologically.

Arab leaders will push Trump toward Palestinian “statehood”, because they see him as vulnerable in seeking rational peace. “Statehood” would be the ultimate form of moral paradox via unilaterally-permanent borders. Meaning, no matter how much Palestinians build up arms or attack Israel, they cannot legally lose any land, only gain, creating a permanent protection against weakening the “Palestinian cause” ideological entity, meaning permanent incentive for war. The ICJ’s Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons says, “The Court was led to observe that “in view of the current state of international law and of the elements of fact at its disposal, [it] cannot conclude definitively whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in an extreme circumstance of self-defence, in which the very survival of a State would be at stake” Thus, if “Palestine” were a state, and they claimed their survival were at stake, they would claim a lawful right to use nuclear weapons against Israel based on this opinion. In sum, a Palestinian “state” is a path to use of nuclear weapons against Israel. So is the increased twisting of the world’s moral compass against tiny Israel defending itself.

In the immediate short term, Trump should do the following

Much of the legal and diplomatic efforts the Arabs have bargained for - preventing Palestinians from losing land, preventing Palestinians from leaving, and preventing diversity of ideological viewpoint - are designed to take away Trump’s ability to weaken the ideological entities of Hamas, the (intertwined) Palestinian cause, and Anti-Zionism. Notice how when Trump announced his Gazan relocation plan in February, Hamas said they wanted to negotiate the next day. Trump was getting close, and everything they were doing was to undo his ability to approach Solutions.

The Arabs will always oppose any real solution unless we find the weaknesses of the ideological entities that control their decisions.

Since Hamas shredded the deal, the points that pressured the deal are back in play: 1) Annexation of Gaza, 2) Helping Palestinians emigrate from Gaza, 3) Holding Egypt responsible, and 4) Holding Qatar responsible, for starters. Trump must understand where his true leverage comes from. Otherwise they think it’s a fluke, and they hold all the cards.

Divide the Hamas ideological entity three ways, and the Palestinian cause entity into two, as follows:

a) Trump should not allow Arabs to push or rush him toward a “Palestinian state”.

b) Arabs getting Trump to make promises against immigration, against encouraging immigration, against confiscating land, are exactly the things that will continue this war forever against Israel and the West. Trump should walk back any such commitments as they are not allowing Gazans to emigrate.

b) We must create multiple, fast, diplomatic, legal, and physical exit pathways for all Gazans wishing to emigrate from and leave Gaza, and start the flow. It’s like letting steam out of a pressure cooker. Even though Trump’s peace plan allows Palestinians to leave, the Arabs will hinder Palestinian emigration, like controlling a faucet. If touching stories of Palestinians who wish to leave Gaza and find a better life elsewhere are glorified with viral videos, it starts the debate. We must answer the moral question that a Palestinian’s individual choice to leave is superior to others’ ideological goals for them to stay. The single biggest way to weaken Hamas is to increase the flow of Palestinians voluntarily leaving Gaza. For Hamas, in addition to Israel and local clans, this opens up a third front - the ideological fight against Palestinians leaving.

c) We should local clans against Hamas by supplying them directly with food and aid. U.S. or Israeli troops going in to Gaza and killing Hamas members is not a threat because the civilians killed will turn the broader, global ideology in their favor against Israel and the U.S.. But supporting local clans and using others against Hamas is a huge threat because it’s Arabs killing Arabs, and there’s only loss without the ideological gain. Tell the Arabs this is also to weaken Hamas. Don’t let Qatari, Egyptian, Turkish or any other Arab troops into Gaza. Local security only, clan by clan. Keep them divided like in the Bible until they learn to make peace ideologically.

d) We must answer the moral question that there cannot be a Palestinian “state” while they want “from the river to the sea”, and implement a new education system. There are 2 million Gazans, and if they wanted to eliminate Hamas, they could because they outnumber Hamas 100 to 1.

e) The U.S. should not label Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist group, yet, even though they are, as there may be better strategies available.

f) We must correctly answer the moral question that the world misunderstands, that if Israel is attacked, it has the right to take land in response, as that capacity preserves peace.

With these, the more conflict Hamas causes by not disarming, the more Gazans will voluntarily leave to other countries. A voluntary Palestinian exodus necessarily weakens Hamas and all Palestinian terrorist groups. This is why Arabs are pulling away from the cease-fire deal - they don’t want the continuing conflict to drive Palestinians out.

With these, time is on our side. We are winning, regardless whether Hamas is in power or not, whether the reconstruction is succeeding or not.

The above is just an introduction. With new understandings of “ideological dynamics”, we can create the systems to correct the world‘s moral compass, answer the unanswered questions that cause ideological divides and their conflicts, and accomplish the “impossible”:

• Permanently solve the Middle East problem

• Encourage Arab states to accept and allow passage of more Palestinians

• Broaden global support for the “Palestinian choice” ideology

• Neutralize, all terrorist and Islamist ideologies on the ideological entity level, including Hamas, Arab anti-Zionism, and even global Islamism and anti-Semitism

• Fix the anti-Semitic United Nations and international legal bodies

• End Islamists’ “forever” conquest war against Israel, America, and the World

• Recede the global Islamist expansionist and colonization movement in favor of moderation for the good of the entire world, including Muslims

• Reset the world’s moral compass on the fundamental issues of our time

Ultimately, we can’t solve the Middle East conflict without addressing the biggest underlying outstanding moral question that humanity faces. Whether Islamists can conquer Israel is exactly the same moral question as whether Islamists can conquer Europe and America and Russia and China and every other country. As long as this moral question globally remains unanswered, Islamism will continue to expand, and there’s no reason it won’t try to fill the power vacuum it sees in Israel. The Jewish people are the origin of the world’s moral perspective. That’s why Jews are the “canary in the coal mine,” and that’s why evil ideologies rise globally based on identical moral questions to those causing hostility faced by the Jews.

Either we answer today’s outstanding moral questions and help reset the world’s compass, or I’m afraid there will be a nuclear war, and even that won’t work because ideologies are bulletproof and bombproof. Again, they include:

• Why is it moral and legal under international law for every country, if attacked, to take land defensively, except Israel?

• Why does the world eagerly relocate refugees from every other conflict zone, except the Palestinians?

• How can many Muslims be decent people, but their combined product be one of conquest and conflict?

• Is it globally moral or immoral to allow Islamist conquest of all other indigenous peoples of the world, starting with Israel?

• If one life equals one life globally, why can’t the will of 480 million Arabs supersede the will of 15 million Jews? If one nation is worth the same as one nation, why cant 57 Islamic nations’ will supersede that of one Jewish state?

The United Nations and ICJ are unable because their moral compass has been corrupted by the union of Leftism, Islamism, and anti-Semitism. Taking away U.N. money won’t help, moving it won’t help, and withdrawing won’t help. The only thing that will work is to take away its power, and the only way to take away its power is with a new system to better answer the outstanding moral questions that the U.N. is unable to. Remember, the Arabs don’t know how to deal with power fluctuations, so the more new we have, the more bargaining power we will have with them. We have all the negotiating leverage in the world. We just need to better understand how to use it.

I’ve developed a framework for this based on my theories of ideological dynamics, and could use some help with it.

It’s coming soon.