Entitativity analysis: Palestinian relocation
Why exploring Palestinian relocation can divide good Palestinians from bad, split the "Palestinian cause" ideology into two goals, help the Palestinian people, create peace, and secure Israel.
Photo by OpenClipart-Vectors / Pixabay
SUMMARY: The Palestinian problem is not about land or resources but an ideological conflict; and based on Daniel Ben Abraham’s new theories on Entitativity, the conflict can be resolved by correctly addressing the ideological dynamics.
Entitativity analysis: Palestinian relocation
By Daniel Ben Abraham
A conference of Israeli Ministers and Parliamentarians in Jerusalem on January 28th 2024 examined the idea of voluntary relocation of Palestinians. In attendance were 15 members of Knesset and 11 Parliament members, including National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, Bezazel Smotrich, and over a thousand others, discussing related ideas.
But to gain increased global support, the world must understand why a relocation option may be not only advantageous, but a necessary component of even the most liberal approach to the peace process. As I discussed in my article on my Three-Option Plan, Israel is only keeping Palestinians out of Israel; but it is the rest of the world’s mindless policy of not accepting Palestinian refugees that is keeping them in an “open-air prison.” Not only is allowing Palestinians who want to leave the freedom to do so not genocide, but it may be the prevention of genocide.
First understanding
Humanity misunderstands the true causes of our wars, all wars, and that’s why armed conflicts occur despite all of man’s knowledge and wisdom. Wars are not really about land or resources or even religion. Rather, I believe there is a secret key for unlocking all war amongst mankind, which I call PeaceMatrix™ Entitativity theory.
People don’t usually act for the reasons they think they do, especially not as we approach conflict. People usually act based on subconscious impulse, primal instinct, and emotion, justified by select supportive logic after the fact.
Soldiers usually don’t start wars, but neither do leaders. The causes for wars that leaders and experts explain to their populations before, and historians explain in hindsight, are materially incorrect. The progressive actions and escalations leading to war are not the cause of war, but a symptom of another problem. But if these are symptoms, what is the true problem that is the cause of war?
The key to all human conflict, perhaps more valuable in predicting and preventing war than knowledge of every fact of human history is, that wars are caused by the collective psychological dynamics of in-group versus out-group polarization. As humans approach conflict, an unconscious ideological collective psyche (“hive mind”) dominates what we perceive to as individuals to be our rational thought, causing irrationality, strategic errors, escalations, and war.
This is why NATO won’t make a peace deal with Russia over Ukraine - because it is not an individual thinking clearly, but a groupthink erroneous collective decision. The hated of Jews is not rational. Nor is Harvard support of Islamic extremists over the “start-up nation” of Nobel Prize winners. Nor feminists supporting Hamas terrorists who would give them no rights. Nor Hamas terrorists aligning with communists who ban religion, etc.
Summary: The collective hive minds that control mankind as we approach conflict do not follow their proclaimed ideals or values, but operate in the collective unconscious under a different set of rules. The word “Entitativity” literally means the degree to which the individual versus the collective hive mind is the sovereign entity.
Second understanding
If we correctly understand these ideological dynamics and find ways to moderate and guide them, we can prevent, avoid, and end wars, maybe all war amongst mankind. By war, I don’t just mean nation to nation armed conflict, but civil wars, political upheavals, ideological, group, cultural, and religious disputes.
Third Understanding
The key to the whole mystery of the rules of ideological group dynamics in conflict, and to stopping war is as follows:
Instead of group ideologies being controlled by their proclaimed values and leaders, ideological hive minds grow and spread like separate living organisms, which I call "living organism theory". These ideological living entities behave like amorphous clouds that are the puppet masters of humanity, with power and growth interests separate and superior to their adherents’. They feed off of conflict by gaining more subconscious power over the rationality of their adherents.
(Subscribe for more)