How to Destroy All Islamist Terrorist Ideologies (Q & A)

How to Destroy Islamist Terrorist Ideologies (Q & A)

By Daniel Ben Abraham

Updated 5/9/2025

1. Summary

2. Introduction

3. Q & A

Irrational anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, Islamist ideologies and terrorist groups are ideas that cannot be destroyed by military means, diplomacy, or international law, corrupting the world’s nations’ moral perspective against Israel. However, such narrative-based mass amygdala phenomena have hidden weaknesses and can be neutralized. Strategic application of understandings of the “mechanics of ideological dynamics”, which combines collective neurochemistry, metaphysics, international law, and ancient scripture can dissolve such Islamist ideologies, affecting the behavior of millions on the macro-level. In fact, they are quite primitive when you look beyond two-dimensional efforts at their true vulnerabilities. If the Israeli government is unable to do so, independent systems can be implemented to permanently end the Middle East conflict, destroy all terrorist and anti-Semitic ideologies, and establish peace and security for Israel and the world. Below is a Q & A explaining the fundamental concepts.

1. Summary:

Terrorism cannot be destroyed through such conventional means because it is not the actual problem, but a symptom of the power dynamics of uncontrolled Islamist expansion. Killing terrorist leaders doesn’t stop the ideology, and supporting populations will never “learn their lesson”, but will continue their own self-suffering war against Israel (and the West) endlessly like the 1400-year-long Shiite-Sunni conflict. Our nation-state international system leaves ideological wars as the natural result, and 9/11 and 10/7 are mere milestones in what are now endless wars unless we find next-level solutions.

Israel cannot secure permanent peace solely by eliminating terrorists and their leaders, international law, diplomacy, public relations, all the paper Arab peace deals including Abraham Accords, “mowing the lawn”, or even regime change in Iran, though all of those should also be pursued. Regardless these efforts, global anti-Semitism will continue to rise, until with one anti-Israel U.S. Administration, Israel will eventually be alone. The enemy thought Biden was that Administration and launched a seven-front war starting on 10/7, but will continue their war for centuries awaiting their next eventual opportunity.

The reason the world is turning against Israel in the United Nations with 146 nations recognizing a Palestinian “state” as punishment, is that Israel is losing the broader global moral perspective. This is due to ideological phenomenon that the best Israeli counterterrorist strategists do not fully understand, and even Netanyahu says he does not understand how Britain, France, and Canada could recognize a Palestinian “State”.

Global perspective and the ideological phenomenon that oppose Israel and allow Hamas are not based on a rational analysis of the moral perspectives of Israelis and Palestinians. They operate by a completely different set of unconscious ideological dynamics described below, that appear to behave “irrationally” like anti-Semitism, until both are properly understood. Millions of people willing to suffer, century after century, just to have Jews also suffer, is not rational, nor is it a war. It is a riddle.

What Israeli and American policy misunderstand is neither moral perspective nor anti-Semitism are rationally arrived at by logical analysis of the relative morality of the parties. Rather, moral perspective is spread by ideological group adhesion by collective amygdala neuro-chemical phenomena, that is narrative-based only secondarily.

The day-to-day details of terrorist group actions, individuals, Arab leaders, and the facts on the ground are a shell game of the broader, ideological phenomenon. If it were not Hamas, Hezbollah, or the Muslim Brotherhood, it would be other ideological subgroups formed out of the same ideological supergroup. Al-Qaeda was our enemy because of 9/11 but now they’re enemies of our enemies, like the new leader of Syria. Isis was an enemy, but now parts of Isis are actually against the Iranian regime. We are chasing our tails until our civilizations are destroyed if we don’t learn to understand the broader principles behind these ideological dynamics.

The true enemy are not the human actors, but ideological entities that are invisible, intangible, bulletproof ideas, that will sacrifice human actors and spread and gain power from the conflict by changing global perspective against Israel over decades and centuries, far beyond the foresight of modern Western politicians and counterterrorist strategists.

Policy efforts to divide moderates from extremists, to separate out and punish or eliminate those who carry out attacks, similar to how societies address individual criminal behavior, are necessary, but will not work alone. Nor will persuasion be successful with ideological groups, or even the entire world, to accept our moral perspective and to moderate.

The problem of targeting just the threshold of violent actors but not sympathizers is, the ideology simply recruits more endlessly from a fertile population base of up to 490 million, and such ideological wars can last 1400 years. Reward and punishment against members of an ideology will not change the entire ideology because it works by a different set of rules. The dividing line between 9/11 hijackers and those who “innocently” want to build a mosque at ground zero is not the correct focal point, even if they believe they are well-intended.

Terrorist ideological structures can be dismantled, but Israeli and U.S. efforts are misguided. The counter-terrorism approaches discussed here are on a new level, combining understandings of collective neurochemistry, metaphysics, international law, and scripture to target the behavior of ideological entities themselves. This may perhaps be the first theoretical understanding for neutralizing dangerous ideological entities on the ideological level, from subgroups like Hamas to the broader Islamic expansionist and anti-Semitic ideological supergroups globally.

Israelis know that anti-Semitism rose after 10/7 before Israel even responded, but it doesn’t understand why or how the principles behind such phenomenon can lead to counter-terrorist policy. Israelis understand that taking land, opening the Egyptian border, and relocating Gazans can weaken terrorist ideologies, but they don’t understand the ideological mechanics of why sufficiently to form broader solutions based on the same principles.

Ideologies can be weakened, neutralized, and their trajectory changed by targeting ideological entities themselves. Through strategic application of such principles, an ideology can be divided, folded into itself, weakened, and neutrailized.

Answered in the Q & A below:

• How to permanently resolve the Israeli-Arab conflict

• How to convince Arab states to take Palestinian refugees

• Why worldview and the United Nations turn anti-Semitic and how to stop it

• How to neutralize all Islamist terrorist ideologies

• How to neutralize the global Islamist expansion ideology

• How to neutralize all anti-Semitic ideologies globally

• How to correct the world’s moral compass to see Israel as moral again, as cannot be done through logic and reason

• How to replace the United Nations with a better world peace building system that can never become anti-Semitic

Key ideas developed herein include:

• Ideological wars cannot be stopped militarily alone, and the broader global moral questions facing humanity must be answered.

• The true enemies are not human adherents, but amorphous intangible ideological entities. human actors are merely pawns of ideological phenomenon.

• Ideological entities do not support the interests of their adherents, but have interests separate from and superior to their adherents’, and override collective rational judgment and moral perspective, causing most wars.

• We are unable to destroy ideologies because we approach them rationally, with logical persuasion that Israel is moral, but much of the world doesn’t see it that way, feeding more terrorism. This is because we fail to understand the behavior of the ideological entity is neither rational nor the product of the behavior, interests, morals, or goals of the individuals in the group, yet controls all of these.

• Ideological entities do not follow the narratives of their adherents, but have separate behavior patterns akin to mass-amygdala parasites that behave as living organisms seeking to grow and spread from emotionalized conflict itself.

• Individuals can make peace, but such ideologies cannot make peace or else they will die; and because they are living entities, they don’t want to die.

• Ideological entities cannot be neutralized by targeting just the threshold of violent offenders like domestic criminality, or rewards and punishments targeting individual adherents, as such actions have little to no effect on the ideological entity, which works by a separate set of rules, and welcomes the suffering and death of its adherents.

• Ideological entities are invisible, intangible, and bulletproof, and work by a completely separate set of rules. They have weaknesses, that if pinpointed, can affect the behavior of ALL their adherents.

• Ideological entities Israel faces, from Hamas and Hezbollah to Iran to Arab anti-zionism and global anti-Semitism have numerous metaphysical weaknesses. Such ideologies can be divided and neutralized, and their trajectories changed, because will diverge from their narratives of terrorism and conquest if the correct systems can be set up.

• Because ideological entities are living organisms, they will put their survival ahead of terrorist, conquest, and anti-Semitic goals, like any other living organism’s instinct to survive.

• Such “backdoor” solutions hold the keys to ending all anti-Semitism, terrorism, and wars against Israel, permanently.

• Ideologies can be neutralized by properly implemented strategy that divides the ideology at its narrative fulcrum, turning an ideology against itself. The correct focus point is the moral question that divides the subgroups. Ideological entity neutralization occurs by dividing the ideology along its fulcrum with a choice of two different options for survival of the supergroup that feed the power-growth needs of two opposed sub-groups. Then, the ideological subgroups are forced to divide and compete for control of the supergroup for their own survival. All Islamist ideological entities from Hamas and Hezbollah to Arab anti-Zionism and global anti-Semitism and anti-Israel moral can be neutralized this way.

Here are some examples, not as proposed policy, nor advocated, but only as illustrations of principles of dynamics of ideological conflicts.

• As one example, Israel can eliminate Haniyah, Sinwar, Narsallah, Assad, and thousands of Hamas for 18 months yet Hamas still wont release all the hostages, but if Israel opened the border with Egypt and allowed all willing Palestinians to leave, Hamas would immediately release all the hostages, by allowing the supergroup Palestinian population to vote with their feet and leave, thus decreasing the supportive population base of Hamas the more suffering they cause, thereby creating a diversity of ideology.

• As another illustrative example, if the world said in one voice that it would recognize Jerusalem as the permanent capital of Israel if the hostages were not unconditionally released tomorrow, they would be released tomorrow. This is because the relative moral compass of the broader Islamist supergroup would suddenly see subgroup Hamas as evil and eliminate its ideological support base, destroying the ideological entity if it didn’t release them.

• As another, if a European nation with Muslims population in the millions said upon the next terror attack, the resulting counter-terrorist actions could cause suffering or deaths amongst them, it would not be a deterrent to the ideological entity, because the ideology would deepen in their collective psyche from the conflict and empower the entity. But if the nation said that upon the next terrorist attack, it would ban Islam, the entity would be deterred, because you would turn the supergroup against the subgroup, neutralizing the subgroup’s viability.

The true war is not just killing individual terrorists and leaders, but setting up the correct ideological mechanics. The ideological growth and spread of Islamism, Arab anti-Zionism, and anti-Semitism globally are not “rational”, but neither are they random. By understanding the behavior of ideological entities and their own interests separate from the interests of their adherents, we can unlock the secrets to permanently end such wars.

Unanswered moral questions are the cause of all of Israel’s wars and increasing global anti-Semitism through moral paradoxes that allow irrational ideologies to grow and create conflict. Some of the current such outstanding questions are:

• Why is it moral and legal under international law for every country, if attacked, to take land defensively, except Israel?

• Why does the world eagerly relocate refugees from every other conflict zone, except the Palestinians?

• How can many Muslims be decent people, but their combined product to be one of conquest and conflict?

• Is it globally moral or immoral to allow Islamist conquest of all other indigenous peoples of the world starting with Israel?

• If one life equals one life globally, then in the leading ideology of 480 million Arabs, if 15 million (3%) are willing to die to kill one Jew each, the world’s moral rule actually creates a paradox that encourages genocide against the Jewish people who are the source of the world’s morality.

The permanent solution to anti-semitism requires the Jewish people, who are the source of much of the world’s moral perspective, to become a major player in world peace building. Ultimately, the end of all ideological wars, and world peace, are possible, by reshaping ideological entities, by implementing new systems like:

• A new, Jewish international court in Jerusalem can continually reset the world’s moral compass to keep new anti-Semitic ideologies from rising, answer the moral questions that would cause wars, and be more effective than and take power away from the anti-Semitic United Nations

• A new AI-guided world peace system built into a social media platform that the whole world interacts with, that continually rationalizes the debate to keep evil ideologies from rising

• Military, political, diplomatic, legal and communication strategies that begin to apply these principles.

By setting up the systems to properly answer such questions, we can accomplish the following:

• The world’s moral compass reset

• The global Islamist expansion movement moderated and balanced with an Islamic ideology that is zionist for its own interests

• The Arab-Israeli conflict resolved with Israel controlling all its Biblical territory

• The United Nations replaced

• Israel returned to its historic role as the center of the world’s moral compass

• Peace and security brought to Israel, the West, and all the world’s peoples

2. Introduction:

The following explains how to solve the Middle East conflict, how to implement Trump’s plan and have Arab states accept Palestinians, how to secure permanent peace for Israel, how to defeat Hamas and Hezbollah, and defeat every Islamic terrorist ideology, every Arab anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist ideology, and every Islamist expansionist and conquest ideology on earth, forever.

Since these are ideological conflicts that cannot be resolved through our nation-state system, international law, military campaigns, economic pressure, nor diplomatic means alone, I approach these challenges through a backdoor I call the “mechanics of ideological dynamics”, based on theories including collective neurochemistry and metaphysics.

For the past 18 months, Israel has fought one of the most brilliant, moral, and just military campaigns in history. Israel is winning by all traditional military calculus of enemy leaders killed, troops destroyed, equipment and funding eliminated, and territory taken. Haniyah, Sinwar, Nasrallah, Assad, and Raisi are neutralized, along with tens of thousands of their supporters. Gaza is in ruin, as are their bases in Beirut, Syria, and Houthi bases in Yemen.

And yet, the seven-front war against Israel continues, just simmering until Trump leaves office, to then reignite. The terrorists still won’t release all the hostages, have already begun reconstituting, and will declare victory, rearm, and continue, same as the Sunni-Shiite war that has waged for 1400 years. And after the untold suffering they brought, if an election were held in Gaza today, Hamas would still win.

The Allies won World War II against Germany and Japan in under 4 years, and then made peace deals with them. When Hitler was eliminated, the Nazi ideology ended, and Germany surrendered. But the U.S. couldn’t destroy the Taliban ideology in 20 years in Afghanistan, and Israel has been fighting Hamas and Hezbollah for over 35 years now, and the broader conflict for 75 years.

Welcome to the newly-evolved threat facing humanity: leaderless ideological wars. We eliminate the soldiers and leaders, and new ones sprout, like a serpent that grows a new head when its head is cut off.

Humanity is now facing an entirely new problem that cannot be won solely by conventional military means, diplomacy, legal process, nor even nuclear weapons.

Almost the entire world cut off military aid to Israel after October 7th, while still fighting for the release of hostages. Without a solution to the underlying ideological problems, one ignorant U.S. Administration in the increasingly bipolar U.S. political system will mean all out war against a completely isolated Israel. Israel’s enemies thought Biden was their opportunity. Israel survived, but its enemies are merely waiting to try again and again, century after century, like the 1400 year-long Sunni-Shiite conflict, happy to suffer endlessly, for the chance to kill the Jews.

The problem is, Israel doesn’t understand how to win the real war - the ideological war.

In reality, it’s not a conventional war, but a riddle; and the war will continue until the riddle is solved.

Israeli former IDF spokesperson Lt. Col. (Ret.) Jonathan Conricus said in a PragerU interview, “Israel understands that it cannot defeat Hamas as an idea, as a call for extremist Muslims around the world and for Palestinians. That is not what Israel is trying to do.”

Likewise, President Trump’s chief Middle East advisor, Steve Witkoff said, “I dont think anyone has a feeling that you can kill off Hamas… Hamas is an idea”.

They’re wrong.

We haven’t made a dent in the underlying problem, because all efforts are on the level of the individual human actor. Nobody knows how to stop an invisible, intangible, bulletproof, fluid, irrational, spreading idea like the “Palestinian cause”, Arab anti-Zionism, global Islamism or anti-Semitism as ideologies.

I do.

Buckle up, and welcome to the party.

Here are the answers to the riddle, and the keys to the kingdom.

3. Q & A

(Please note minor editing in progress, so numbering is not perfect)

1. Why can’t Israel destroy Islamist terrorist groups?

Terrorism is a symptom, not the underlying problem, and we are making the same mistake a doctor might, addressing the symptom instead of identifying and curing the underlying, causal disease. Terrorism is not an ideology; it’s a tactic - a symptom of and measure of ideological adhesion. Germany and Japan were defeated in three years in WW2, but Israel is fighting Hamas and Hezbollah for 35 years and an Arab ideology for 75 years, because its a network of interconnected leaderless ideologies. If Israel doesn’t use the correct strategy, it could be a 1400-year conflict like the Sunni-Shiite divide.

2. If terrorism is not the true problem, what is?

The foundational problem is the uncontrolled power dynamics of global Islamist expansion. The world is wrong for thinking terrorism is a response to mistreatment, because places most restrictive of Islamist expansion have zero terrorism.

3. Why is there so much terrorism threatening Israel and the world?

Our international legal system based on responsibility of nation-states allows non-state ideological groups to avoid responsibility while gaining power. The world’s Muslim population has grown from 90 million in the year 1900 to nearly two billion today, now dominating 50 nations. The expansion of the broader Islamic religion causes ideological subsets to compete for power gains in new prospective territories not under an established Islamic authority’s control. This is why Muslims divide the world into “Dar al Islam” (house/territory under Islamic rule), and Dar al Harb” (house at war).

4. Why does the world only like Jews when they are victims?

Empathy triggers brain neurohormones like oxytocin, activated in the central nervous system with in-group identification, bonding, and trust, which conversely are reduced when dealing with an out-group. When Jews are suffering, many people identify with Jews and resentment of Jews is overcome, resetting their moral compass by aligning their emotions with the Jewish moral compass.

5. Why is anti-semitism so hard to defeat?

In individuals, anti-semitism is a subconscious deficiency. But in groups, it spreads despite its “irrationality” of not serving the group members’ interests. As it’s not rationally based, reason and persuasion cannot defeat it.

6. Are all humans susceptible to anti-Semitism?

All except those who are secure enough in a value system to be able to accept the mysteries of Jewishness. Eastern cultures are largely immune for reasons explained below.

7. Is Israel winning the 10/7 war?

No, because Israel and its enemies have different definitions of “winning.”

8. How does Israel define winning?

For Israel, it’s the number of terrorists and their leaders eliminated, funding cut off, hostages released, Gaza secured, and return to the status quo of building peace on paper.

9. How does Hamas define winning?

Hamas sees winning in the broader, long-term, global anti-Israel ideological context; 146 U.N. members recognizing a Palestinian “state,” the ICC issuing warrants against Netanyahu, all Europe cutting off weapons to Israel (except Germany), and increasing global anti-Semitism and anti-Israel viewpoint so they can regroup and attack again.

10. When will the war be over?

The present is merely a lull while President Trump is in office, in an ideological conflict potentially like the 1400-year-long Sunni-Shiite dispute, eventually turning the whole world against Israel simply for defending herself. With one bad U.S. Administration, Israel will be alone. Anti-Israel Islamists believed Biden was their opportunity on 10/7, but they will keep trying for centuries unless a better solution is applied.

11. Can Israel destroy Hamas?

Not by military means alone, because when their numbers get low, the world will demand Israel stop fighting, and Hamas will declare victory and reconstitute. Even if every Hamas member were killed, new ones would sprout from the fertile Palestinian population base. This is why the Torah said regarding Amalek, to “destroy all memory of them,” understanding that Amalek’s attacks were without good reason, and thus ideological. However now, Israel cannot, nor wants to, kill every Palestinian, Arab, or Muslim.

12. Can Hamas be defeated?

That’s the wrong question, because even if it were, it would be replaced by Hezbolla, the Muslim Brotherhood, or another Islamist extremist group. Hamas is itself a symptom of a broader problem - the Arab anti-Israel ideology of 94% of 480 million Arabs.

13. Why isn’t this war ending?

The question of why the Arab anti-Israel ideological entity should not attack Israel if the world will unite in viewpoint and law-fare against Israel in response remains unanswered.

14. Who is the true enemy to peace?

The true party players to the disputes are not the human actors, but invisible, intangible, bulletproof ideological entities that are contagious, collective neuro-chemical supra-human phenomena residing across millions of amygdalas. They spread, deepen, and possess human adherents through emotion and narrative, supersede prefrontal cortex thought, and skew the moral perspective of adherent populations on a global scale.

15. What is the best understanding of the “Palestinian” problem?

The individual Palestinian will to improve their lives in their own self interest cannot override the collective ideological forces pursuing conquest of Israel.

16. Why can’t the world help?

The two Palestinian ideologies, 1) for individual prosperity, and 2) for conquest of Israel, are intertwined; the world cannot feed the first without feeding the second and thereby causing the second to become more aggressive, and endless conflict.

17. Why can’t there be a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza, or East Jerusalem?

Anything the world does to help the Palestinians, including “statehood” elements, feeds the second, aggressive ideological entity also.

18. How can Israel defeat terrorists who are willing to die?

They may be willing to die, but they die to protect their ideology. If we understand how to neutralize ideological entities themselves, then the unconscious framework within which terrorists and anti-Semites would otherwise wage endless self-harming wars will collapse like houses of cards.

19. Why isn’t Hamas releasing the hostages?

Killing Hamas members, or leaders, even all their leaders, among a supportive population base does not permanently weaken the ideological entity, which becomes even more deeply embedded through emotion and thus strengthened through self-induced conflict. Israel is fighting a two-dimensional physical war against an intangible, fourth dimensional ideological entity.

20. How can Israel get the hostages released immediately?

As a Palestinian can hate Hamas in the morning, and support them in the evening, actions against the human actors alone cannot permanently succeed. Only a metaphysical solution that targets the ideological entity can ultimately work. The hostages would be released immediately if, as examples: 1) Israel opened the Egyptian border to allow out all Gazans who wish to leave, as it would create a “Palestinian choice” ideology and destroy the unity of ideology against Israel, turning Hamas against its own population base; or, 2) If Israel threatened to annex a square mile of Gaza for each day the hostages are not released, this would turn the Palestinian cause ideological entity against the Hamas ideological entity; or, 3) If the world said it would undo U.N. Security Council Res. 2334 and recognize Jerusalem as the permanent capital of Israel unless Hamas released the hostages, because it would turn the entire Islamic conquest ideology supergroup against the Hamas subgroup; or 4) If Israel said it would destroy Iran’s nuclear sites tomorrow, unless Hamas released the hostages because Iran is supporting Hamas financially and is responsible, then the hostages would also be released tomorrow, because this turns the Shiite Islamist supergroup ideological entity’s interests against its own sponsored subgroup. These solutions, like losing land, can work because they have metaphysical consequences of weakening the ideological entities themselves, and not just consequences against the human adherents, as explained below.

21. How does most humanity misunderstand war?

Wars are not caused by soldiers, individuals, or even leaders, nor are they over land, religion, or the claimed excuses. The “leaders” and “terrorists” we blame for war are usually merely the key pawns of the ideological entities on both sides, and their actions merely symptoms of the causal ideological phenomena.

22. Why does humanity have war?

Wars occur because humanity encounters moral questions it can’t answer, and polarizes ideologies across their divides, causing reciprocating errors of judgment, making each side believe they are defending themselves from a worse threat in the other, until they break down the systems that maintain peace (treaties, rules, norms, laws, interpretation of laws, language, communication) until the only remaining option is war.

23. What examples show unanswered moral questions as the primary causes of wars?

Russia invaded Ukraine because the world was unable to answer in time the moral question of how to balance NATO expansion with Russia’s security interests. WW2 occurred because the world was unable to unequivocally answer in time that Hitler’s NAZI ideology was evil and must be stopped. Hamas attacked Israel on 10/7 because the world’s moral perspective had become unable to unequivocally answer that Israel is morally right when defending itself and that the attacking Palestinians don’t deserve a state.

24. Why hasn’t the Israels-Arab conflict been solved?

The world lacks the effective mechanisms for answering the underlying moral questions that ideologies are polarizing across in the present conflict. This is primary and causal; and the attacks, battles, and actions of leaders and terrorist groups are secondary and mere symptoms.

25. Can the current legal systems resolve this conflict?

No. The line the West drew after 9/11 between actionable terrorist and vocal supporter is incorrect, like the imaginary line between a 9/11 hijacker and someone who “innocently” wants to build a mosque at ground zero. Even if we eliminated every terrorist, new ones would sprout from the supportive fertile population base, and sacrifice themselves for their “cause”.

26. What does Israel’s strategy miss?

Israel tries to eliminate terrorist groups by killing its members, like eliminating players of a hockey team. Hamas is not a finite group of people, nor even a group of people possessing an idea. It is, like Carl Jung said, an idea possessing people, that can possess new recruits even if all current members and leaders are killed, if the broader ideological dynamics provide for it. In other words, if you put 1000 non-Hamas Palestinians into an enclave, Hamas would sprout from amongst them. Thus, only metaphysical solutions can ultimately work.

27. Can making peace deals like with Egypt, Jordan, the Abraham Accords, and the Saudis peace bring permanent peace?

Arab culture views peace deals with Israel as “Hodaybiya” - temporary, to be broken as soon as Israel is weakened. Up to 94% of 480 million Arabs do not accept Israel’s right to exist, and after October 7th, even Egypt and Jordan threatened to attack Israel. Arab leaders play “good cop, bad cop”, and use peace deals as shields while their populations continue the ideological war, with Palestinians as their proxy in their stead, as the tip of the spear, all part of one supergroup anti-Israel ideology.

28. Can Israel use logic, reason, and better public relations to explain the evil of 10/7 and anti-Semitism to the world?

Anti-Semitic ideologies can’t permanently be won over by logic and reason, or else Jews, having the best debaters, would not have been expelled from nearly every diaspora for the past 2000 years. The same “irrational” anti-Semitic localized diaspora ideological phenomenon is now spreading globally due to modern communication. The issue is not how humanitarian the IDF fights, but how metaphysically correct Israel’s strategy is.

29. Can Israel hope to be so strong that her enemies would not dare attack?

Israel’s strength must remain a primary defense, but deterrence is largely lost as the broader Arab anti-Israel ideological supergroup becomes so cohesive that it uses subgroups as proxies - willing to sacrifice terrorists, entire groups, and even nations as expendable, acting in their own disinterest, for the overarching supergroup’s goal of fighting Israel. This is why five Arab armies attacked in 1948 as one unit, why the Arabs attack collectively in every war since, and likewise the current seven-front war threatening to expand. Israel is not fighting nations nor groups, but one ideological entity with numerous overlapping subgroups.

30. Why won’t Palestinian punishments/rewards/education ever help Palestinians moderate to seek peace?

Any such reward or punishment toward individuals does not affect the ideology, which spreads and operates by a different set of rules. Palestinians hate Israel more than ever despite Israel’s best efforts, and Hamas would win an election today.

31. Why won’t Palestinians’ suffering make them moderate, learn “the error of their ways,” and let a leader come along to seek peace? Aren’t many Palestinians and Arabs good people?

Individuals can be moderate, but an ideologically-cohesive group will always channel political power to the most extreme elements supported by a segment of the population, sidelining moderates. This is why AOC is the “leader” of the Democrat party. This collective unconscious phenomenon is far more powerful than the conscious will of Palestinians wanting a better life.

32. Why can’t the Palestinians change?

The broader 480 million Arab supergroup spectrum of viewpoints must always have an extreme edge, and without another enemy, it has no other target to direct its natural human tendency to polarize against, except Israel, via the Palestinians. The broader Arab anti-Israel ideology feels the power gains, but not the consequences of the Palestinians serving as the tip of the spear of their movement.

33. Why is international law (The United Nations, Security Council, International Court of Justice, Human Rights Commission) turning increasingly anti-Semitic?

The U.N. is an imperfect system of rules that degrades over time as the shared values and interests evolve without a system to reset them to their source moral perspective other than war. Laws only work within an overarching value system to interpret them in. Nations lose their moral compass over time as ideologies morph and shape over time, and apply the same rules with a new perspective and bias. Anti-Semitism is not rational, but primitive urge, which in turn controls emotions, which in turn controls ideology, which in turn controls moral perspective, which in turn controls language, which in turn controls legal interpretation. As such, logic cannot override it.

34. Why can’t this problem be fixed in the U.N. with logic, reason, legal, and diplomatic means?

The current international nation-state system does not control ideologies, so ideologies are now free to wage wars. The U.N. has 50 Islamic “nations” representing largely one ideology, and one Jewish state for another. Because the ideological entity is empowered to grow largely unrestrained, the world will increasingly side with it regardless morality, thereby losing its moral compass until it’s all-out war against the Jewish people. Humanity wouldn’t value peace or even have a U.N. without the Jews, and morally and legally sidelining Israel is a twisting of the world’s moral fabric.

35. Why did anti-Semitism increase after 10/7 before Israel even responded?

Global moral perspective is not determined rationally, but by ideological dynamics that are collective unconscious and power-based. The ideological entity simply felt empowered and continued the attack through other adherents globally. The global feeling of ideological empowerment feels to them like rationally-derived moral justice.

36. Why didn’t sympathy for the Jewish people on 10/7 reset the world’s moral compass?

The ideological dynamics of uniting with the anti-Semitic entity was already too widespread and powerful. Emotionally-based sympathy for Palestinian suffering overrides the world’s logic and skews its moral compass away from Israel.

37. Why can’t Israel “Mow the lawn” and occasionally eliminate whatever terrorists/nations attack, return to the status quo, and repeat to preserve Israel’s security indefinitely?

Israel should eliminate every terrorist. However, despite Israel’s best diplomatic efforts and being morally right, the more Israel is attacked, the worse Israel will look internationally, thereby encouraging endless and increasing attack against Israel as the broader ideological entity gains power from the conflict.

38. Why do “Palestinians” want a “state” now when they didn’t accept one under Arafat at Camp David II, and why can’t they have one now, when Israel was open to a “Palestinian state” before?

In 2000, if the Palestinians gained statehood and then attacked Israel thereafter, the world would have sided with Israel. Today, if after a “Palestinian state” were formed, if they bring in an army and weapons and attack Israel again, the world will side with Palestinians, proven by 10/7, no longer conditional on their moral values nor based on reason. Thus, such peace is impossible unless the world’s moral compass is reset first. This is why the war isn’t ending.

39. Could Hamas be incorporated into the political process to force them to remain peaceful like Northern Ireland?

No. It may be possible if a terrorist group were a subset of an independent population supergroup limited to the same overlapping territory like Northern Ireland. Here, the Palestinians are merely the aggressive edge of the 480 million Arab regional and global anti-Israel supergroup ideology.

40. What is the definition of “evil”?

Evil is a divergence in viewpoint from the established moral perspective. In a civilization based on Judeo-Christian values like ours, the rising ideology that is most relatively opposite to those values is the most evil. That’s why it always targets Jews first, like the “canary in the coal mine”. Hatred of the Jews is an inherent part of the growth and divergence process of rising ideologies that continue to evolve. That’s also why, in Eastern and other non-Judeo-Christian based civilizations, rising ideologies are not necessarily defined by opposition to Judaism. An ideology carries its own separate moral perspective. There is no ideology that sees itself as “evil” - each sees its own value system as (relative) “goodness”, even if built on conquest of others.

41. How do unanswered moral questions lead to evil ideologies rising?

The Nazi idea of Aryan conquest of all the world’s peoples in the 1930’s and caused war until the world answered that it was was “evil” and impermissible. The idea of Islamist conquest of all the world’s peoples is likewise ambiguously met today, causing conflict until the world similarly answers the present question as impermissible and why.

42. Are Arabs or Muslims inherently evil?

No, and many are fine people. But, the leading conquest/anti-Israel ideology amongst many of them is, in the sense that it is expansionist and conquest-oriented, causing suffering and harm to themselves and others. These theories are a superior way to understand and untangle humanity’s wars because the enemy is not the other group, but the malignant ideological dynamics.

43. Why do Islamists see Israel as evil?

From the leading Islamist ideology’s relative perspective of its expansionist trajectory, Israel’s existence and resistance to conquest seems “evil” to its values. The difference is, Israel’s moral perspective based on its indigenous rights is consistent with the preservation of every other indigenous people and culture on earth and thus universal; but Islamist expansion is not and threatens them all as well.

44. What do you mean by resetting the world’s moral compass?

Islamists have not only burned babies alive, but declared they will conquer the world. This is universally against the morals of every other civilization on earth. The reason the whole world is not alongside Israel is because the rest of the world has lost its moral compass due to the subconscious bias of spreading ideological forces due to power dynamics.

45. If unanswered moral questions cause conflicts, what is the most underlying fundamental moral question of our time?

The underlying moral question facing Israel, and the world simultaneously, is whether Islamist expansionism can conquer all the indigenous peoples of the world, starting with Israel. Until this is answered, the Islamist expansion and conquest ideological entity will continue terrorism around the world, global “peaceful” expansion and migration, political conquest and establishment of Sharia law eventually colonizing every other nation, and endless war against Israel. Jews are the “canary in the coal mine” because the moral questions are one and the same, directly related the ability of the expansionist ideology to spread and gain power without limitation. This also answers those who claim Israel was once the source of the world’s morality, but is now irrelevant.

46. How do such unanswered moral questions cause conflicts?

The world agrees it is immoral for Islamist armies to conquer nations by force, but has not answered whether such conquest by “mostly peaceful” means is immoral. The world does not understand nor know how to address how so many Muslims can be decent and well-intended people, and grantees of equal rights, yet that their combined product is one of expansion and conquest. Nor, however, if one life is worth one life, how a group can migrate to, and conquer and eliminate the culture of another. We miss and fail to address that ideological entities are not the sum of the product of the individuals, but take on separate and independent characteristics. We not only lack the legal, political, and communication mechanisms to properly answer this question, but our current systems address it incorrectly making the situation worse.

47. Can you give an example of such a moral paradox?

By humanity’s own development, we adopted the value of human life and equality in value of each life, derived from Jewish principles. But with 480 million Arabs and two billion Muslims, if 15 million of them (3% or even 0.75%) would be willing to die to kill one Jew each one for one, the world’s moral rule of equality actually creates a paradox that encourages genocide against the Jewish people who are the source of the world’s morality. The more “moral” this misguided world tries to be, the closer it gets to another Jewish genocide. Israel understands the U.N. is anti-Semitic, but not how to fix such paradoxes to reset the world’s moral compass. Without fixing them, ideologies will polarize across these divides, and continue to grow stronger, unite with others, and grow more dangerous.

48. How does this paradox translate to the Palestinian problem?

Similarly, if all nations are “equal”, the anti-Israel Arabs can just spin off a new nation, “Palestinians”, with supposedly just as much rights as Israel, into constant war degrading both their international standings. The broader anti-Israel ideological entity is simply sacrificing an offshoot to try to conquer Israel, seeking to exploit the nation-state system as a loophole.

49. Why are so many of the world’s nations and ideologies anti-Semitic?

It goes to the fundamental moral paradox that to judge Israel equally to another nation is anti-Semitic. Why? Because the opposing ideological supergroup possesses up to 100 times the people, and up to 50 times as many countries, and the ideology will sacrifice those nations for the genocidal goal of the broader ideology. Our nation-state system doesn’t have the mechanisms to factor this into its moral calculus. The U.S. is one of the few nations that generally understands this and supports Israel.

50. Is a nuclear deal and peace with Iran’s current leadership possible?

No. The broader anti-Israel ideology will compel the subgroup Iranian regime ideology empowered from it to build them, and will sacrifice Iran if necessary for its broader ideological goal. Iran is playing a back-and-forth game of reject and cooperate, building up opposition to an attack on its nuclear facilities. Iran knows that any time it lies and says it will cooperate and agree to a deal, the world will oppose use of force. All negotiations are an unwinnable trap like quicksand, and the only solution for global stability is regime change.

51. Can Israel ultimately win this war with nuclear weapons?

No, because the opposing ideologies and world’s moral perspective will turn even more against Israel in the long term.

52. So if logic, reason, morality, diplomacy, law, public relations, and military force cannot win this war alone, how does Israel win?

The Jewish people must learn how to neutralize hostile ideological entities themselves, in addition to fighting their human adherents, and be able to reset the world’s moral compass before another Holocaust.

53. How can we defeat an enemy that is irrational?

Ideological behavior like anti-semitism is “irrational” in that it doesn’t serve the interests of the adherents, but irrational doesn’t mean random. Ideologies spread and shape views of populations by a set of rules, that if understood, can be used to change the course of ideologies, neutralize, and even destroy them. Buried within the mysteries of the irrationality of anti-Semitism is a hidden key to stopping all ideological wars against Israel, and maybe even peace for all mankind.

54. What do Israel and the U.S. misunderstand about neutralizing ideological entities?

Policy is based on the belief that the nature and trajectory of ideologies can be changed by changing the views and behavior of the adherents and state leaders; whether through peace deals, education, diplomacy, reward/punishment. But even Soviet style media control did not work on a majority. Israel must stop making the mistake of believing that the world is rational, and must understand why and how anti-Semitic ideologies spread. Policy assumes the world will not continue to become increasingly irrationally anti-Semitic, and that diplomacy can “convince” the U.N. to side with Israel against terror and genocidal anti-zionism. In reality, the problem is not rational, but contagious phenomenon. While it may be temporarily reduced by Israel’s military victories, the broader supergroups continue to gain ground globally. The current U.N. system cannot stop the spreading ideological phenomenon that slips through the cracks of the system; and as currently unrestricted, the broader ideological entity has unlimited power gain potential.

55. What is the necessary key understanding of ideological entities missing?

The human adherents are not the actual top-level party-players to the dispute. Ideologies have interests separate from their adherents and superior to their adherents. Separate interests, superior interests, the ability to supersede rational thought, and survival instinct give ideological entities not only the behavior characteristics of separate living organisms, but ones that are sovereign and superior over their human adherents. In other words, ideologies are parasites - supra-human parasites that reside across millions of amygdalas, shaping the behavior and moral perspective of millions on the macro level. What else is suicide bombing, if not the ideology showing that it is the sovereign entity, and the human terrorist merely a drone, to be sacrificed for the ideology’s interests. Elon Musk accurately said the same regarding wokism: “…why the hate and violence against me? Because I am a deadly threat to the woke mind parasite and the humans it controls.”

56. What is the key to understanding irrational, anti-Semitic ideological entities?

The “irrational”, self-harming behavior of anti-Semites that continues such conflicts makes sense when you view the ideological entity as a separate living organism with it own separate interests as primary and causal, and the behavior of human actors as secondary and a symptom.

57. Why is this perspective the key to defeating such ideological entities?

When you address the ideological entity’s weaknesses with metaphysically-correct solutions, it will preserve its own interests by its survival instinct, and sacrifice all its adherents, narratives, terrorism, anti-Semitism, and even anti-Israel efforts, in order to save itself, like any living organism. This will work when all the logic, reason, diplomacy, international law, and war will not. We see this narrative acceptance as a product ideological adhesion, for example, shown by how Leftists tend to agree on ALL of their varied assortment of issues, even contradictory issues. Narrative contradictions are neutralized by the ideological adhesion, which is why even opposing ideologies unite against a common enemy.

58. Why haven’t we as the West been able to target these ideologies’ metaphysical weaknesses?

Whenever we get close to finding such a pressure point, the terrorists thwart our strategy by giving politicians a deal they cannot resist, whether Hamas, or Iran’s nuclear program. When Trump proposed relocating Gazans, Hamas announced in an hour that they were interested in negotiations. When Smotrich said Israel would annex land in Gaza for each day the prisoners were not released, a new hostage deal was quickly agreed to. That’s because these turn the interest of Gazans directly against the interests of Hamas, dividing the ideological entity. Arabs mention “the Zionist entity“, and even admit like Lebanese filmmaker Youssef El-Khoury said, “there has never been a Palestinian entity”. The enemy does not think as individuals, but understands and thinks collectively in terms of these ideological entity dynamics far better than Israel, and they thwart Israel’s would-be solutions the moment they are fledgling ideas.

59. How do you find and use an ideological entity’s weaknesses?

As an introduction, ideas are divisible along their narrative fulcrums, which you can find by the moral paradox at the heart of the outstanding moral question upon which the dispute exists. A system that turns one ideological subgroup entity diametrically opposed against another by fueling one at the expense of the other divides the supergroup. This is why I say “the opposite of war is nuance.”

60. Why are ideological entities vulnerable this way?

The ideological entity relationship stems from the symbiotic relationship between man and tribe developed through prehistoric human tribal conflict, wherein without the group, the humans it resides in would die. Before speech, humans thought as a group, often addressed threats as a group, and morality was relative to the group.

61. How is ideological spread connected to speech and education?

The reason that millions of pro-Palestinians gather in street protests around the world is not speech, but contagious neurochemical connection to the hive mind. It’s not speech, but actually the opposite of speech. It’s like watching an emotional movie on television and tearing up. Emotion is infinitely more powerful than rational thought. Historically, propaganda and censorship were used to control and direct ideologies. Now, new ways to ensure speech is free and yet constructive are needed.

62. Do ideologies grow and spread like a virus?

Not exactly like a virus, nor like fire, nor randomly. It’s a leaderless hive mind, impossible to destroy by killing only those who choose to commit overt terrorist acts, because the fertile population base remains. The entity understands everything its adherents do about the weaknesses of our legal systems, and is smart enough to not send all its adherents to war at the same time, for example.

63. If capable of 1400 years of suicidal self-suffering conflict, what is the weakness of Islamist ideologies?

Islamist ideologies cannot withstand a diversity of ideological opinion. It’s their kryptonite. There is no ideological diversity anywhere in the Arab world, and even Hamas and Hezbollah cannot operate in the same sphere without killing each other before they can kill Jews. By the way, what is a burka, if not the uniform of an ideology to prevent diversity of ideas. Islam has been at war with itself since the day Mohammad died in 632, for 1400 years, because it could not decide whether his successor should be chosen by a council, or should be his cousin. Think about that for a moment. His cousin has been dead 1300 years, yet the dispute still rages. If you can create a strategically correct diversity of ideological viewpoint, you don’t have to fight dangerous Islamist ideologies. They neutralize each other, allowing neighbors and fellow Muslims to have peace and prosperity.

64. Can Palestinians give up on destroying Israel?

Individuals yes, but as a collective, Palestinians can only give up this aim if the broader Arab and Islamic supergroups gave up that ideological narrative that 94% support (or if the ideological entity were otherwise neutralized). The Palestinians are neither independent of broader Arab ideological goals nor united in their ideological goals, as required for statehood. Many want conquest of Israel, and are ideologically inseparable from the broader Arab “nation” that shares Palestinian goals but not consequences.

65. Is it morally correct to relocate/bomb/destroy the Palestinians?

It is morally correct to bomb and even destroy them because their group is the aggressor, Israel has offered them peace, and they have refused. They are unable to control their own actions as a group and Israelis should not suffer for that. It is not morally correct to bomb them without also doing everything possible to give those who wish to leave a chance to leave, by opening the Egyptian border and or other pathways. If other Arab states force Gazans to stay like Egypt having sealed its border, that is their act of aggression against both Israelis and Palestinians.

66. Why doesn’t Palestinian suffering in this war turn Palestinians against Hamas?

You’d not only need opposition to the Hamas ideology, but you need an alternative ideology to support. If you introduced an alternative ideology in Gaza, Hamas would have to fight it. Hoping for another terrorist group over Hamas is only a temporary measure, as whomever wins will eventually become equally anti-Israel. A competing group could grow into a popular ideology, but only with support from the broader ideological supergroup, and through carrying out dramatic Hamas-style attacks, which no Israeli government could politically support.

67. Why didn’t the “West Bank” being run by Fatah, and Gaza being run by Hamas create diversity of ideology?

They weren’t forced into conflict for dominance because they were able to each control separate territories, with monopolies over those territories. When Israel first pulled out and left Fatah in charge, Hamas first fought and destroyed Fatah.

68. Can moderate Palestinians ever take over?

No, because the moderate Palestinian viewpoint is based on individual interests, and the anti-Israel ideological entity is the aggression-arm of the 480-million-member Arab world’s anti-Semitism ideology, infinitely more powerful than individual human will. Even if a moderate leader took over long enough to sign a peace deal (and survived assassination), it would be disregarded shortly thereafter, with the ideology seeking to keep the benefits but not restrictions.

69. Is President Trump’s Gazan relocation plan correct?

President Trump’s relocation plan is a metaphysically correct solution set - one of the first proposed in the 75-year conflict, which is why it is unitedly opposed by all Arab states. The first key element of an entire universe of metaphysical solutions is to divide the “helping Palestinians” ideological entity from the “conquest of Israel” ideological entity, by creating a system that forces their interests to be diametrically opposed. Relocating Palestinians does this, because the closer the Palestinians get to a better life, the further they are from Jerusalem, dividing the ideological entities. Relocation isn’t a solution merely because it moves them. Relocating Palestinians is a solution because if the Arab world says Palestinians must not leave, but many Palestinians themselves choose to and do leave, it would create diversity of ideological viewpoint and divide and neutralize the broader hostile entity which fuels the Palestinian entity. This helps reset the world’s moral compass paradox by putting Palestinians’ wants against the ideology of conquering Israel. According to one 2024 poll, 49% of Gazans would leave voluntarily if they could.

70. What happens if Palestinians can leave?

If Palestinians can vote with their feet in a region with no ideological diversity nor democracy, Hamas (or any leadership) would have accountability to the Palestinian people, and not merely be an arm of a broader ideology. If the Palestinians relocate for a better life, or even have a “state” anywhere else, the first benign Palestinian prosperity ideology gains, whilst the second hostile conquest ideology loses by being moved physical farther from Jerusalem. It would be a self-regulating system of reciprocal weakening of the ideological entity the more aggressive it becomes. The ability of Palestinians to relocate is more a factor in this war than any successful military operation. This is why I say, “you don’t need an army to stop an army, just ask them a question they can’t answer.”

71. How do we know ideological division is the primary weakness of anti-Semitic Arab ideologies?

This is why the Torah says to “scatter your enemies”. in Numbers 10:35: “And it came to pass, when the ark set forward, that Moses said: Rise up Lord and let your enemies be scattered and let them that hate you flee before you.” It doesn’t say kill your enemies here, but “scatter”, meaning divide; separate, meaning ideologically. Before Israel’s King Saul followed God’s commandment to attack the Amaleks, he first told the Kenites to separate from the Amaleks he was about to destroy. This let the Kenites choose whether they stood with the Amaleks and wanted to be destroyed, or wanted to save themselves. Here, the Arabs are preventing the modern “Kenites” from choosing. The Rambam also taught the military lesson of “the three walls”, to always leave your enemy an escape route; not so you fight fewer soldiers, but so the enemy is divided ideologically between fighting and fleeing.

72. Can a Palestinian state work anywhere?

Further from Israel maybe, such as in the Sinai, Lebanon, Jordan or Arabia, as that distance will necessarily separate the Palestinian welfare ideology from conquest of Israel ideology. One gains while the other moves further from its goal, so it’s within a metaphysically correct solution set.

73. Why do Egypt, Jordan, and other Arab states refuse Palestinian refugees?

Because while Arab leaders consciously disapprove of Hamas, they are unconsciously part of the same Palestinian “cause” ideological entity and the broader Arab conquest of Israel supergroup entity. That entity will not allow them to divide it. As “Son of Hamas” Mosan Hasan Yosef admitted in an interview that if the Arab governments accepted Palestinian refugees, “the Palestinian cause would die.”

74. Why do the Arab leaders say they oppose Hamas?

If they truly did, they would take in Palestinian refugees until Hamas surrendered. They consciously hate the threat Hamas or Muslim Brotherhood may pose to their family’s/ideological subgroup’s rule, but unconsciously are part of the same ideological supergroup, proven by the fact that they take a position consistent with the moral paradox.

75. Why is this a moral paradox?

They say they care about the Palestinians, but they won’t even accept those who want to leave. They really care about the Palestinian “cause”, which is both intertwined ideologies of prosperity and conquest of Israel together, because they are unconsciously adherents of both, unable to distinguish.

76. How does voluntary Palestinian relocation solve the moral paradox?

Voluntary relocation would answer the underlying pivotal pending moral question posed to the world, of the world saving every other refugee group from conflict zones, except the Palestinians. It would resolve the moral paradox, reset the world’s moral compass on this issue, give Palestinians a choice, allow the world to put the Palestinians ahead of the Palestinian cause, thereby destroying the Palestinian cause ideology.

77. Why can’t the United Nations fix the “Palestinian” conflict?

Forcing the Palestinians to stay in Gaza is an act of ideological aggression by the Arab states and populations that slips through a loophole of the international legal framework. Corralling the Palestinians is like putting two roosters together in a confined space so they have to fight.

78. How can we get Arab leaders to accept Palestinians?

Arab leaders will oppose Palestinian relocation, and will pressure other Arab leaders to, unless 1. doing so threatens the broader ideological supergroup entity, in which case the broader ideology will put itself ahead of the Palestinian cause entity, or 2. the interests of their individual nation’s leadership family or subgroup is threatened and separated from the broader supergroup, in which case the subgroup will put its interests ahead of the supergroup. Egypt, Jordan, and even the Saudis would, with the right strategy, take Palestinians who want to leave. If different interests from one or more ideological entities overlaps, the entity with the strongest ideological grip will control their behavior. That’s the explanation for the old Arab quote to the effect of, “I against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe…” Enough of this primitive two-dimensional war nonsense. This war is a riddle, and these are the keys to dismantle all Islamist ideologies permanently.

79. Isn’t Egypt’s Camp David peace deal with Israel a cornerstone of stability?

Sadat did not enter the Camp David Peace Deal with Israel out of the kindness of his heart in 1973, nor because he was losing soldiers. Israel’s control of the Sinai created an ideological power vacuum for another subgroup that threatened Sadat’s group’s leadership, separating their interests from the broader Arab collective. Policies of propping up moderate Arab governments have not worked on the ideologies of their populations.

80. What aspects of international law skew the world’s moral compass regarding Israel?

There are a number of paradoxes in international law that actually fuel the conflict and need correction. A new U.N. Security Council Resolution could correct Obama’s false Res. 2334, which says that as long as the Palestinians don’t agree (which they never will), that Israel is an “illegal occupier.” This is a foundation for lawfare against Israel and encourages the world to see Israel as immoral. Israel must be allowed to annex land in response to attacks like every other nation, as that legal capacity is one of the only deterrents to future attacks. This capacity divides Arab supergroup ideologies metaphysically, separating subgroup entities not wanting to lose land from those subgroup entities gaining power from wanting to attack Israel. This furthers peace, because as we see in Lebanon and the Egyptian border tunnels, Arabs have no real united interest in preventing attacks against Israel otherwise. Security Council Resolution 1701 is another example. Israel cannot gain friends by giving back land; but only weaken enemies by the threat of taking and keeping more land, which keeps hostile ideologies divided and neutralized. That’s why the Torah provides for “mandatory wars” and “discretionary wars”, not to increase farmland, but for necessary peace.

81. Why can’t the United Nations correct itself?

The U.N’s failure is the inherent result, when the Jewish people - the source of the world’s morality, and who are continually throughout history right when the rest of the world is wrong - are forced into a consensus-based majority-rule system. For most of civilization’s history, Jerusalem was the center and source of the world’s morality, and often the Jewish people were correct when the world’s majority was wrong. 50 Islamic countries now outweigh the one Jewish politically, leading to endless conflict, because their expansionist and conquest ideology seeks to replace the established morality, and spreads with no restrictions on its expansion. International bodies have already been corrupted by the spreading bias, which to them feels like justice but to the Jewish people is irrational anti-Semitism. The system lacks the tools to correct the world’s moral compass, unable to recognize basic historic facts like the Jewish people being indigenous to the land of Israel, and likewise that indigenous rights trump conquest and expansion ideology, whether in Europe, Israel, Asia, India, Africa, or elsewhere.

82. How can Israel build a path to its long-term security and fix the biased United Nations and international bodies like the ICJ?

The Jewish people should correct the broken moral compass of the anti-Semitic United Nations and its international bodies. Logic, reason, and persuasion do not work. Adding and taking away money does not work. Ignoring or withdrawing from the United Nations and international bodies will not work, as they will just carry on their agenda anyway with funding from the opposition. The ICC didn’t even care that it lacked jurisdiction in issuing Netanyahu’s arrest warrant. The only solution is to take away their power. And the only way to do that is to begin the process of developing new global peace building systems to better answer the unanswered moral questions the current systems are incapable of answering correctly.

83. How can the Jewish people reduce anti-Semitism permanently?

Individual anti-Semites aside, we can reduce the dangers of the spread of growing global anti-Semitic viewpoints by metaphysically neutralizing evil ideologies that rise before they can polarize, join other ideological entities, spread and grow dangerous, and skew the world’s moral perspective.

84. Why would the U.N. or international systems allow that?

It won’t, as it has already been ideologically corrupted, and Israel’s influence minimized. Israel’s potential metaphysical solutions within the system have already been blocked by her enemies including with binding international law, and new ones would be also. Needed are new international systems, including 1) new global communication systems to foster enhanced rational and constructive debate with a stable moral compass, 2) a new court to keep evil ideologies from rising by building peace around the world according to Jewish values, 3) a new conglomeration of indigenous peoples, cultures, and religions that are unrepresented by the current system to reset the world’s moral compass on Islamist expansion, and 4) a new Islamic authority to speak for Islam the way the Pope speaks for Catholics to moderate the top-level supergroup.

85. What kind of communication system is needed?

Modern human communication is unconstructive. A new global communication system is needed to answer the moral questions that humanity stumbles over and would otherwise be unable to answer. One such system could foster a new kind of continuous, ongoing, organized rational global debate based on a new type of algorithm facilitated by AI. I published a book on Amazon.com, “The PeaceMatrix”, about this new way to categorize the elements of all human disputes and splice them into social media feeds to make all human communication metaphysically hyper-constructive at global peace-building. This would work because as a group becomes more ideological, less rational, and less interested in the individual welfare for the sake of the entity, it becomes less able to withstand debate about its moral perspectives. I tried to reach Elon Musk to discuss and help me develop and implement such a system, but have not been able to reach him.

86. How can a new court help world peace and permanently reduce anti-Semitism?

One way to prevent evil and anti-Semitic ideologies from rising is by establishment of a new international court in Jerusalem to answer humanity’s unresolved moral questions before ideologies can polarize around them and grow dangerous. The role of the Jewish people, ha Ivrit, is to be different and even do the opposite - to be right when even the whole world is wrong. Perhaps when faced with war, the task of the Jewish people is to, ironically, try to foster peace for others. Because Judaism is largely the source of the world’s moral perspective, such a court can globally prevent the rising of new anti-Semitic ideologies, which are “evil” by definition, by continually realigning parties globally with Jewish morality while solving global disputes at the same time. It is the moral compass the world needs, and is trying so hard to prevent. It is a mitzvah to appoint judges under the Torah, “Appoint judges and officers in all your gates" (Deuteronomy 16:18), and also the highest court, “Sanhedrin” (Deuteronomy 17:8-13).

87. Where would such a new court’s international authority come from?

Typically international courts like the ICC and ICJ derive their authority from international consent through treaty like the U.N. Charter or Rome Treaty, but have little enforcement power anyway. Theoretically, a court that resolves disputes according to universal morality is correct and powerful even if one (or even both) of the parties do not accept the decision, because it is universal truth in a world that has lost its moral compass, and consistent with the rules all peaceful, indigenous peoples and cultures need to survive. Think of King Solomon’s judgment with the two alleged mothers to cut the baby in half. Diplomacy can be opposed, but universal law cannot, just like you cannot oppose an explanation that objects fall according to the laws of gravity. “A teacher who teaches falsely will eventually lose all their students.” Theoretically, a court that is consistently metaphysically and universally correct will generate its own authority over time. As other systems corrupt over time, the new court will be better able to solve global problems, and its authority will have to be recognized.

88. What kind of rulings might such a court issue?

Such a court would issue rulings consistent with universal law, and Judaism, on outstanding parallel moral issues globally, to continually rebalance the world’s moral compass and keep evil and anti-Semitic ideologies from rising. The Jewish people have always been this moral compass, but simply being the most moral army is insufficient, as we see the world turn against Israel regardless. Thus, new systems are needed to reestablish the moral authority of the Jewish people, to be able to further peace. As an example, in India, there are ancient Hindu temples upon which Islamic mosques were later built atop of when Muslims later conquered those territories, now increasingly under Hindu control again. The moral question of whether an indigenous people can reclaim their earlier holy site after a later Muslim conquest is the very same question as whether the Jewish people can reclaim Jerusalem after later Muslim conquests. And, it’s an offshoot of the same moral question of whether every people have the right to reclaim land once taken, or even resist conquest in the first place. Similarly with the Greek Orthodox Christian Monastery at Saint Catherine's, established between 548 and 565 by Byzantine Emperor Justinian I, and recognized as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, being placed under Egyptian state ownership. Israel has hundreds of allies around the world, facing the very same moral question in their territories on issues of indigenous rights versus Islamist expansion; the world just lacks a system for uniting all these peoples and confirming the moral rule as universal. 3/4 of the world is not Muslim, and without a new system, eventually they all must run into the same paradoxes as Israel. The question of whether Muslims in a country like India should have equal rights to Indians in the only Hindu state is exactly the same as whether Arabs in the only Jewish state should have equal rights. Or whether a Palestinian state should have equal standing to the only Jewish state. Following a rule of “equality” actually encourages conquest of all the world’s cultures, and endless conflict and genocide.

89. Who would run such a court?

I can’t tell you when Mashiach will come, but he cannot fight over a billion people; and he can’t convince hundreds of millions of irrational ideologues to change their position through logic and reason. Nor does he need to. He can only establish world peace, secure Israel permanently, and rebuild the Temple by such principles. If he is not ready, maybe we can get started until he gets here. We have a seven-front war, hostages still held, 146 nations recognizing a “Palestinian” “state”, and virtually only the U.S. and Germany militarily supporting Israel after 18 months. If you have a better idea, let me know.

90. What kind of rulings would the court issue regarding Egypt?

The new court in Jerusalem can issue a ruling that Egypt violated international law by not accepting Palestinian refugees, caused Palestinian suffering by allowing terror tunnels, forced Palestinians to stay in Gaza as an act of ideological war, and thus owes the Palestinians the Sinai as compensation, as one example. Offering Palestinians homes in the Sinai as compensation is universally correct because it turns the power of the Palestinian “cause” ideology against Egypt’s resistance to taking Gazans, and the Palestinian cause is far more powerful than what Al Sisi wants. Arab governments launched the wars of ‘48, ‘67 and ‘73, and the refugee problem is a result of those wars. Egypt and Jordan cannot morally absolve themselves of the liability for that, intentionally seal their borders, and continue their Palestinian “cause“ at the expense of Palestinian individuals’ wants. If the U.N. and international courts are incapable of recognizing these facts, remedying this problem, or even speaking truth, then such new systems are needed.

91. Why should Russia and China side with Israel and the United States?

We share more similar and more rationally-based moral perspectives, and disputes that are more rationally resolvable. China knows this, shown by their limitations on Islamic expansion including the Uyghurs. More importantly, China’s empowering of Islamist ideological entities allows them to seek power by triggering a nuclear war between Russia, China, and the United States, endangering all three superpowers. In other words, China’s and Russia’s actions are suicidal, but they don’t see it because of biasing ideological forces and short-term perspective. Fueling the fire of Islamism thinking the fire is closer to the United States by allowing Iran to get nuclear weapons and encouraging Palestinian aggression is an error bound to come back to burn them.

92. What other systemic problems and legal paradoxes must be corrected?

Another paradox created by our international system is that there are 50 Muslim nations representing a single ideology, yet immune from the consequences and order of the nation-state system. Part of correcting this systemic loophole includes laying the groundwork for Islam to be recognized as a nation, to prevent taking advantage of and yet at the same time being immune to the goals of international law. This empowers domestic citizenship laws to better limit Islamist political expansion, to help create greater accountability and moderation.

93. How could the world get Islamists to moderate?

The world needs a new collective “Conference of Indigenous Peoples and Cultures” worldwide, to unite and speak out against uncontrolled Islamist expansion, which is neither in their interests nor in Muslims’ interests. Such a collective cooperation body of over a hundred united indigenous cultures, religions, and groups, each resisting Islamist expansion in their localities can be used to demand that an Islamic authority issue rulings on the key moral questions of global Islamic expansionism in “Dar al Harb”, and thereby help moderate expansion by creating accountability for current Islamic states (“Dar al Islam”). In other words, to secure Israel and create world peace, the fundamental outstanding moral question must be answered, that Islamist expansion may not conquer Israel nor the other indigenous peoples of the world. This is done by holding Islamic nations (“Dar al Islam”) accountable for Islamist expansion (“Dar al Harb”) until Islamism moderates. This can be done by demanding that a collective of Islamic states (whether the Arab League, OIC, or new collective) issue opinions and rulings on what Muslims may or may do around the world, just like the Pope does for Christians, for moderation of the entire religion. Right now there is no consequence to Islamic nations from global Islamist expansionism. Imagine 1,000,000 CIA agents running lose in the world changing global governments, and the U.S. having zero accountability for it. Islamic nations would be required to take positions and issue directives on key ideological matters and on behalf of all Islam, individually or collectively. If an authority speaks on behalf of all of Islam to moderate or accept Israel, it will be difficult for Islamist ideologies to grow. If they refuse to take clear positions, then they can be held accountable. No more saying one thing to Western leaders, and another in Arabic. By creating accountability, the world can create new Islamist protectionist ideological entities to oppose and moderate Islamist expansionist ideological entities. That’s the ideological divide that is the key to world peace.

94. What rulings might such a court produce?

The court can issue a ruling that Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, by not taking in Palestinians, violate the Quran’s literal language, and are unIslamic. The Quran contains zionist language that will neutralize the Arab anti-Israel ideology, including, “And thereafter We [Allah] said to the Children of Israel: 'Dwell securely in the Promised Land” [Qur'an 17:104]) The global moral paradox here is that the Quran actually has zionist language, but the leading Islamist ideology doesn’t follow it. It’s such a threat to Islamist ideology, that when the Israeli embassy in Singapore posted this Quoranic verse online, they were forced to take it down immediately. Such Quoranic language is an Achilles Heel on a level unimaginable and incomparable to conventional two-dimensional warfare. They understand, but Israel does not. It is absolute truth, and thus a power vacuum for new ideologies to rise. This can neutralize the Arab anti-Israel ideological entity by empowering ideological opposition to force moderation of the current anti-Israel viewpoint. The threat being, if Arab leaders violate the Quran, they can be replaced by other Muslim subgroups who more correctly follow the Quran’s precise zionist language, and are more “true Muslims.” Arguably, any Arab activity that doesn’t allow Jews to “dwell securely in the promised land”, including not taking in Gazans or pushing for a “Palestinian state,” is unIslamic, meaning infidels. The political threat to Arab leadership subgroups causes their ideological entity’s interests to diverge from the broader Arab hive mind, thus complying with the demand to accept Palestinian refugees. Arab zionist ideology can channel power to develop friendly communities outside Israel’s Biblical borders.

95. Why is this language in the Quran?

The mysteries of Jewishness torture antisemites’ primal unconscious, until they form an ideological entity and are compelled to even be willing to die to kill Jews, becoming pure evil. The world eventually sees this, and the evil is destroyed, typically by the collective disapproval of the largest supergroup housing the ideology. Military force is secondary. This has happened to countless ideologies that no longer exist. That’s why the Quran says “they shall dwell securely in the promised land” - to divide good Muslims from bad, to save Islam itself from being destroyed by its own anti-Semitism. Even Mohammad understood this. There’s nothing more powerful than an idea, and this is the idea that can neutralize all of Israel’s enemies permanently. Military force is secondary, to be used to support the true peace building - ideological-level conflict neutralization through metaphysical means.

96. How does limiting Islamist expansion destroy terrorist ideologies?

The reason Islamist groups wage (political, migration, or terrorist) war around the world, and against Israel, is because they believe Islam will take over the world, and their subgroups are competing for power in those dar-al-harb territory. If these groups believed fighting over these new areas would harm Islam as a whole (their top-level supergroup), their ideological infrastructures would collapse like houses of cards.

97. What do you say to those who believe Islamists will never listen to our interpretation of the Quran?

Wrong. This is two-dimensional thinking. An individual may not be convinced, but ideologies can form and spread with these values. The ideologies can’t help but follow it, like a fire when you feed it oxygen. When you understand and fuel it with the proper ideological dynamics, it must work because the underlying narrative is metaphysically consistent!

98. What do terrorist and Islamist ideologies fear most?

The spread of a narrative that is metaphysically correct - it dissolves their ideological entity, as another entity canibalizes it. The Arabs who turned the Palestinians against Israel cause suffering because they actually turn against Islam. The “Naqba” or “disaster”, when the Jewish state prevailed in 1948 over the Arab armies that attacked her, was because Arab ideology turned against the language of their own Quran, which explicitly gives the land of Israel to the Jewish people as does the Bible and Torah. Same with Arab losses in ‘67, 73’, the endless Palestinian suffering, and deaths of terrorist leaders like Haniyah and Nasrallah and the pager attacks. The pager attacks didn’t just work because they removed many Hezbollah fighters, but because in the backs of their minds Islamists believed the attack was so brilliant and so hurtful to terrorists that it was the work of God. (Israel just didn’t say so.) As the Quran states, "And [remember] when Moses said to his people: 'O my people, call in remembrance the favour of God unto you, when he produced prophets among you, made you kings, and gave to you what He had not given to any other among the peoples. O my people, enter the Holy Land which God has assigned unto you, and turn not back ignominiously, for then will ye be overthrown, to your own ruin.'" [Qur'an 5:20-21] Arab anti-Semitic ideology supports neither the Palestinians nor the Quran, which states unequivocally, “And thereafter We [Allah] said to the Children of Israel: 'Dwell securely in the Promised Land” [Qur'an 17:104] Remember, according to the Quran, this is God saying that every Islamic ideology (and government) that does anything against Israel (including not taking in Palestinians, or allowing ideologies to flourish) can be “overthrown” and “ruined”. The Palestinians are not mentioned in the Quran. All we need is the courage and know-how to use this language correctly. It’s like kryptonite to Islamist ideological entities. And, it’s probably a binary choice of 1400 years of war against Israel, or a solution like this. Israel needs to stop this primitive back-and-forth, and metaphysically end all organized war against her.

99. How would this solve anti-Semitism forever?

Anti-semitism will still exist in individuals, but such systems will prevent the irrational rising and polarizing of such ideologies. Moral and legal victories would unite all peoples on issues parallel to Jewish values, continually weakening anti-Semitic ideologies. The more violent Islamists become, the more the united world would push for a recession of global Islamism, forcing their moderation, in the interest of Muslim peoples as well.

100. How does metaphysically limiting global Islamist expansion protect Israel and world peace?

Limiting the uncontrolled expansion of the top level supergroup conditionally on moderation and accountability of the subgroups will force ideological division between Islamist expansionists and protectionists. This solution works because the supergroup and its subgroups are living entities wanting both, now forced to choose. It’s a question that cannot be answered. Individuals can answer it; the ideological entity cannot. Why not? Because the part that wants to protect itself and the part of it that wants to grow are also separate living ideological entities that will feed power to their most extreme elements and polarize against each other. Being able to limit uncontrolled Islamist expansion and moderating Islamism will help bring permanent peace to Israel and countless other indigenous peoples and cultures because Islamism will fight itself as it tries to conquer others. To help Islam, we must create a choice, like King Saul gave the Kenites, whether to side with Amalek or not. Remember, “You don’t need an army to stop another army, just ask it a question that it can’t answer.“

101. How do we know the world’s moral compass will one day correct to align with the Jewish people again?

It must, same as after every time in history a group opposed the Jews, then became extinct. The indigenous peoples of the world can never decide it is moral that they be conquered by Islamist expansion. The world will never decide that burning babies in their cribs is moral. The only reason much of the world sides with the Islamists instead of Israel now, temporarily, is a collective delusion where their ideological entity’s moral compass is replaced by the power gains of uniting with expanding ideologies. Their compass will reset one day, and they will admit, like the germans do today, that they were wrong and don’t know how they could have done it. The goal is to reset the world’s moral compass without another Jewish Holocaust, because if you can do it once, you can do it forever, and have permanent world peace.

102. Isn’t stopping Islamist expansion impossible?

Not only is destroying Islamist ideologies possible, but the Prophet Mohamed, the founder of Islam, literally said so. It’s even written in Islam’s Holy Hadith, which says Islam itself not only can, but will one day disappear. Hadith, Sahih Muslim 146, Book of Faith 146:65 “Verily Islam started as something strange and it would again revert (to its old position) of being strange just as it started, and it would recede between the two mosques just as the serpent crawls back into its hole.” If you have the ability to create the systems globally that cause Islam to recede, you have the ability to moderate it, including its expansionist and conquest movement. Limiting expansion conditionally on moderation, expansionists will be opposed by protectionists. The entire Islamic world will have to choose between conquering Israel, and preserving Islam. This will help balance and moderation in all Muslim peoples’ interests also. If Israel didn’t exist and Islam expanded to conquer Russia and Asia and others, they would not be as constructive as the options with Israel. This path is consistent with the Quran and good for Islam and Muslims also. And they must moderate, because unless Muslims moderate and fully oppose Islamist expansion, the world’s moral compass will one day correct and reset, and they will go by way of the Egyptians, Amaleks, Assyrians, Babylonians, Greeks, Romans, and Nazis. Giving them a choice, like the Kenites, saves Islam. What those other civilizations didn’t realize about Jews being the eternal light is the same thing that many Muslims today don’t realize. In reality, the Muslims who follow the Quran which says Jews “shall dwell securely in the promised land,” and the Hadith, are the true Muslims saving Islam, and those who violate the Quran and lead it to the path of these other civilizations by persecuting Jews, are the infidels. Ultimately, these solutions will correct the fundamental moral paradox of our time while minimizing unnecessary war, and protect all the world’s indigenous peoples, starting with Israel.

Shalom,

Daniel Ben Abraham